State Dept. fires official after internal debates over Israel
Shahed
Ghoreishi recommended expressing condolences for slain journalists in
Gaza and opposing the forced displacement of Palestinians, according to
documents reviewed by The Post. He was fired days later.
August 20, 2025 The Washington Post
Palestinians flee to southern Gaza during Israeli bombardment of the territory in late 2023. (Hatem Moussa/AP)
The
State Department fired its top press officer for Israeli-Palestinian
affairs following multiple disputes over how to characterize key Trump
administration policies, including a controversial plan to relocate
hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip that critics
consider ethnic cleansing, according to U.S. officials and documents
reviewed by The Washington Post.
Monday’s
firing occurred days after an internal debate about releasing a
statement to the news media that said, “We do not support forced
displacement of Palestinians in Gaza.”
Shahed
Ghoreishi drafted the line, which resembled previous remarks made by
President Donald Trump and Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff, who
said in February that the United States would not pursue an “eviction plan”
for Gaza. State Department leadership vetoed the move, instructing
officials to “cut the line marked in red and clear,” according to a memo
dated last week.
U.S.
officials said Ghoreishi’s firing has sent a chilling message to State
Department employees that communication straying from ardent pro-Israel
messaging — even if it’s in line with long-standing U.S. policy — will
not be tolerated. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to
discuss internal matters.
The
State Department did not offer a rationale for Ghoreishi’s firing. “We
do not comment on leaked emails or allegations,” State Department
spokesperson Tommy Pigott said. “The Department has zero tolerance for
employees who commit misconduct by leaking. … Federal employees should
never put their personal political ideologies ahead of the duly elected
president’s agenda.”
Ghoreishi
told The Post he was not given an explanation for his firing, which the
State Department was not required to provide due to his status as a
contractor. He said the incident raised troubling questions about the
department’s position on the potential expulsion of Palestinians from
Gaza.
“Despite
a strong reputation and close working relationship with many of my
colleagues, I was unable to survive these disputes,” he said, noting the
language he recommended for the media statement had been previously
cleared by the State Department since Trump took office on Jan. 20.
Another dispute inside the State Department occurred earlier this month following Israel’s targeted killing of Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and several other journalists in Gaza City.
Israel
claimed al-Sharif was a Hamas member, a charge denied by Al Jazeera.
Israel has not made similar claims about the cameraman and other
journalists killed alongside al-Sharif.
As officials contemplated how the State Department should address the incident, Ghoreishi recommended including a
line that said, “We mourn the loss of journalists and express
condolences to their families.” State Department leadership objected in
an email sent Aug. 10. “No response is needed,” the email said. “We
can’t be sending out condolences if we are unsure of this individual’s
actions.”
A
woman holds a picture of Anas al-Sharif, an Al Jazeera journalist
killed by an Israeli strike in the Gaza Strip this month. (Yuri
Cortez/AFP/Getty Images)
A
key opponent of Ghoreishi within the department was David Milstein, a
senior adviser to Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. Milstein
is known for confronting staff throughout the department in defense of
the Israeli government, officials familiar with the matter said.
Critics
of Milstein within the State Department contend he appears overly eager
to please Israeli officials and frequently involves himself in matters
that are beyond the scope of his responsibilities. “Milstein is an
adviser to an ambassador,” one official said. “That’s it, yet he has his
hands in everything.”
Milstein
did not respond to a request for comment. Pigott condemned criticisms
of Milstein and called him a “valued advocate for the policies of the
Trump Administration and for the American people.”
Milstein
and other State Department officials clashed in July when Milstein
sought to release a statement under Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s
name that condemned Ireland for considering legislation that would ban
trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, officials said.
The effort alarmed U.S. diplomats in Europe, who viewed the appropriate
next step to be consulting with Irish officials in private before
publicly condemning the country’s actions. Ultimately, U.S. diplomats
overseeing Europe and the Middle East prevailed over Milstein and
prevented the statement’s release.
More
recently, Milstein and Ghoreishi disagreed over Milstein’s push for the
State Department to refer to the West Bank as “Judea and Samaria,” the
biblical name for the region that is widely used within Israel. The
territory is internationally recognized as the West Bank, and
Palestinians object to the use of Judea and Samaria as legitimizing
Israeli settlements and potential annexation — a concern shared by
advocates of a two-state solution.
A
Milstein memo reviewed by The Post was drafted in response to questions
from the Associated Press about House Speaker Mike Johnson’s visit to
the territory. The memo praised Johnson (R-Louisiana) for “making
history as the highest-ranking U.S. official and first speaker of the
House to ever go to Judea and Samaria.”
Ghoreishi
managed to cut that line before it was shared with the news media and
inserted previously approved State Department language that used “West
Bank” while referring other questions about Johnson’s trip to his
“office for further information,” the line said.
The question about displacement from Gaza is particularly relevant given reports
that Israeli officials are in talks with South Sudan about relocating
thousands of Palestinians to the war-torn African nation. Critics say
the plan, if implemented, would amount to ethnic cleansing and a war
crime. Israeli officials say the plan would amount to “voluntary
migration,” a characterization challenged by those noting the besieged
enclave’s chronic lack of food and water and the sustained Israeli
military campaign.
Palestinians flee Israeli bombardment in Gaza. (Fatima Shbair/AP)
Ghoreishi’s
supporters in the department rebutted spokesman Pigott’s suggestion
that he worked against Trump’s agenda. One State Department official
said Ghoreishi always cleared his recommendations internally and had a
“proven track record of being able to channel President Trump and Rubio
in the public talking points” and noted that, “He’s the guy who wrote
the Secretary’s tweet ‘Make Gaza Beautiful Again.’”
Ghoreishi said he was not motivated by anti-Trump animus and had been inspired by Trump’s May speech about the Middle East, which he said some senior State Department officials continued to resist.
“Trump
called out neocons and Western interventionists for failing the Middle
East, and claimed he wanted to help pave a new path for the region,” he
said. “The hawks on the seventh floor of the State Department do not
match that vision.”
The department’s seventh floor houses Rubio’s office and those of other top officials.